From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3E2723858434; Sat,  7 Jan 2023 08:29:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3E2723858434
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673080150;
	bh=uMdqkdeI63+YWTMceyjMpjrSR/4oLTJUeBzPO84qaKw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=jyEHH1nkxoQ3gGhGwhk1SvTYsVRIEVLZ5p0AnWyODy6DVsgmpPIRcSWbSX5XuXosi
	 RkKhW0d5vlFej4RaMBlsJ86CWlxyPSmU5bqlHiTM/9MeaU+sDAp1Cknoh9NhwmbcrQ
	 a3lWiz+GxjfTfzcAHODmJx1/z+S1tdsQEufVw4aA=
From: "jdx at o2 dot pl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108221] Building cross compiler for H8 family fails
 at libstdc++-v3/src/c++20/tzdb.cc
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 08:29:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jdx at o2 dot pl
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108221-4-fPsKoktOx1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108221

--- Comment #11 from Jan Dubiec <jdx at o2 dot pl> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jan Dubiec from comment #6)
> > Please note -mn -mint32 options =E2=80=93
> > normal mode (aka 16-bit mode) with 32-bit integers.
>=20
> Has this bizarre mode ever been able to build libstdc++?
Yes, it was possible to build libstdc++ in this mode before introduction of=
 all
that C++20 time zone stuff in 9fc61d45. E.g. I am able to build 907c84cb wh=
ich
is parent of 9fc61d45.

That being said, the normal mode is indeed "bizzare" and I can't imagine my=
self
why one would want to use it these days, when the original 16-bit H8/300 di=
ed a
long time ago and its descendants are just dying. Perhaps support for normal
mode should be removed just like support for H8/300 was in mid-2020 (as far=
 as
I remember).=