From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4B0C73858D20; Mon,  9 Jan 2023 13:54:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4B0C73858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673272469;
	bh=u7BLh2XsrksaB5IFd/Jsb9C3xTHFZOwKqiTQU+j9kYQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LQlALlr66++Ljkx6eFjUwEWgerji8LCbbdX5f6k0yUdVvwIa3I2tK2Yp+6kTj2pYN
	 pFFFUdJtpKgACktv0iXQLCgPJTQY2lcO3vn5TuvP75IwK/N3kg4EAXCKh2mQCX1RhO
	 jTKb53XkshaXuSJ02uz3erilX+htRJUqdmF5DH60=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/108226] __restrict on inlined function parameters does not
 function as expected
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 13:54:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: alias, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc everconfirmed bug_status component
 cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-108226-4-gp0Yp1UKpw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108226-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108226

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
          Component|tree-optimization           |ipa
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-01-09

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For the first case it's the order of inlining - we first inline Func2 into
Func3 early and only then inline Func1 at IPA time which fails to put the F=
unc1
accesses under __restrict.

For the second case it's with __restrict:

> ./cc1 -quiet t.c -O2 -fopt-info -fdump-tree-all
t.c:27:3: optimized:  Inlining Func2/2 into Func3/3.
t.c:22:3: optimized:  Inlined Func1.isra/5 into Func3/3 which now has time
12.500000 and size 21, net change of -7.

vs without

> ./cc1 -quiet t.c -O2 -fopt-info -fdump-tree-all
t.c:27:3: optimized:  Inlining Func2/2 into Func3/3.
t.c:22:3: optimized:  Inlined Func1.constprop.isra/6 into Func3/3 which now=
 has
time 4.375000 and size 7, net change of -21.

so somehow the restrict qualification pessimizes IPA-CP?!  Martin?

Note with restrict it's again the first issue.  -fno-early-inlining helps
there.=