From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 222E53858D32; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 03:13:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 222E53858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1672110828; bh=KHMSYol+9k1Szc4CmHjqygvNCbN0QUqHs2XUvTxVsJU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nUaJMuzom3r7rU7GbKoDze/lsAZ/0JjfPfqi7T/kIGg7KG7lJjAMcxOZa4tOKDaDt BHWrwTGws6PxUvT+KHJLDhUGl9T2nx6OCTve/czBGxe62K4RZTFrQnxAgU2lo//gp2 RYgfKDz8FD08fSbFOUIMJVcmgUaFiCsTx+TS2WM0= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108230] assert() spuriously activates maybe-initialized warning Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 03:13:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization, needs-bisection, needs-reduction X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108230 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to David Shin from comment #5) > Indeed, no warning on trunk! Sorry, should have checked trunk version bef= ore > reporting this. No it is a good thing to report as we might want to get it fixed for gcc 12= .=