From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 18234385841D; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 17:59:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 18234385841D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1672682384; bh=o+ehUlIswXUdZJEQxJGNZdUtF6PX7YXcIffBGdF0F58=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LUHghDausK7h65Bj2imcEr4b/IVKE/T5j7omUs9Tcmx3djTSL7pMzWQrvZYI42gyd zw08GI23xGjLnnQYDSgQJodftopMsgHH0XsROZDeAn41O5vocRpznN1+hRhhTzsb4p cae6ng9gnd/5lwOlkjv3hyR6cy7NlC09Os00TIQo= From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108235] FAIL: g++.dg/compat/abi/bitfield1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o link Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 17:59:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108235 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Working on a patch to add support for sync libfuncs. Downside is one needs to add -fno-sync-libcalls to generate calls for libatomic. I think the HP implementations of pthread_mutex_lock and pthread_mutex_unlock in libpthread are better than what I will do for the sync routines. That's why I haven't implemented the sync routines before. Is there an alternative?=