From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B9C513858D39; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 02:44:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B9C513858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1672281897;
	bh=oo53rzprLLD401uaQQxtYkW1lCJq4fRR9oGAem+tmNM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=bj5KBXoO/vfUiGA7IaRtIJSZGrVqRceaBRPw+b25qkDN8/3PN5YIcRdEfer58xEmC
	 XD1zJZXCD4R06OSiravVSbXLcka9FGcTQifTih7Vlhn0O4qSntjGz8Tl0kDG4RsM6M
	 ujUQk7Pex46b+OsGT9B9qpXj4K3PkYJz5tflS+pE=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/108242] [10/11/12/13 Regression] '__FUNCTION__' was not
 declared when used inside a generic (templated) lambda declared inside a
 template function
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 02:44:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, needs-bisection, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also
Message-ID: <bug-108242-4-uMEU9VKlxR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108242-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108242

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D84925,
                   |                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D82029

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
related to PR 84925 and PR 82029 . The first one was caused by the second o=
ne
and the second one was caused by r8-2720-gf44a8dd56f5bfb which I suspect mi=
ght
have introduced this bug ...=