From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A5E543858D35; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 13:21:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A5E543858D35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1672838506; bh=KtkHTGmqYIh6c553ewZyqRVX+GLqOKw1DqtgGafouEs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jYpycjIi5ftY3lfjqWoUHh2iQ0WmJA4D1qwoBAH3TYOGQg7QZcBS2Ot+0fRhfII2e KCHhZz1DEltkxexNiTXl+h+SdM9ddko+NYE5RuZUm1kbTLzNWhw5098NeNpWM/40ln dVK76FMs5Mg3KwotHBBkJc1AmpTzOWXa8RcBufEc= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/108243] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missed optimization for static const std::string_view(const char*) Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 13:21:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108243 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- GCC can't even optimize it properly for C++20 when using if-consteval: static constexpr unsigned long length(const char* s) { #ifndef FIX if consteval { unsigned long n =3D 0; while (*s++) ++n; return n; } #endif return __builtin_strlen(s); }=