From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 65F643858401; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:52:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 65F643858401
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682002332;
	bh=JIkIlF0AXgKgtgQ+6KLttZNWkwV+xsNzxTkEWwbjDW4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Sx03rPMCLA7VKhhl867AsjY+hwW3xFcbHMH2/Fp1BN2Z6rUJRv4gNSZLAyODTit1F
	 djEAfxQKwVhPG1lspT2J90Jan+LqCnGtDTwEvHNwdGgk0/x2CpTp+KlCrhfgO/hsAu
	 blmR+ybJeumLpqgW27COhXR4Tf6WagACMoRRW030=
From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108247] Missed opportunity to generate shNadd on risc-v
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:52:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-108247-4-wqAvp3qUEL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108247-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108247-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108247

Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Per c#1 and c#2.=