From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AF2273858C53; Fri, 30 Dec 2022 06:48:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AF2273858C53
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1672382922;
	bh=BIl/wfcZAtF8XL0bXnsAbFjGC9TL5T9cbcL9zouExj0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=IS5l/UWdDYtPBTLxSyjKPreEIJ380UnlyW3LjUsrL/dq2aReLoVzWAPk46UYXTa3R
	 ZSwGi1iGHIcU+zxrTahdanH7BwEmtv37oi0YplJkXA1qH6o3K9svDY4fGWQek2LRVo
	 MuNBEcAjiXMpDgYp+Pj6m2sViiGF88V2RH4hTnaA=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108253] [13 Regression] ICE in
 set_nonzero_bits
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 06:48:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-108253-4-foObSdbKxi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108253-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108253-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108253

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-12-30
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I suspect it is trying to set the nonzero bits for:
  _19 =3D &_15->data_;

>From the assert:
                if (reinterpret_cast<size_t>(ring_->data_) % 4 !=3D 0)
                        __builtin_abort();

But I could be wrong ...=