public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug modula2/108261] modula-2 module registration process seems to fail with shared libraries.
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:45:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-108261-4-7nOBXzZbj9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-108261-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108261
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Gaius Mulley from comment #11)
> > > > when a module has the same name but a different interface are the
> > > symbols distinct (i.e. mangled differently)?
> > >
> > > no. So, as you say, the ordering of the static link works fine.
What if we made them mangle differently?
That might solve a bunch of problems in one go.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-11 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-01 17:14 [Bug modula2/108261] New: " iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-01 17:16 ` [Bug modula2/108261] " iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-01 17:24 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-01 17:59 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-02 13:39 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-04 16:24 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-05 21:10 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-09 15:10 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-09 16:34 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-09 22:34 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-10 0:01 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-11 2:00 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-11 8:57 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-11 9:42 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-11 9:45 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-01-11 9:55 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-11 15:02 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-11 15:07 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-11 15:22 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-11 21:10 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-14 23:30 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-14 23:32 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-14 23:34 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-19 16:59 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-22 0:39 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-23 9:48 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-23 12:07 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-23 20:35 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-25 16:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-27 13:34 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-108261-4-7nOBXzZbj9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).