public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108271] Missed RVV cost model
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 07:43:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-108271-4-NUQmLB1gBc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-108271-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108271

Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is basically the same problem as PR108412.  As long as loads/stores have a
high(ish) latency and we mostly do load/store, they will tend to lump together
at the end of the function.  Setting vector load/store to a latency of <= 2
helps here and we might want to do this in order to avoid excessive spilling.
I had to deal with this before, e.g. in SPEC2006's calculix.
In the end insn scheduling wouldn't buy us anything and rather caused more
spilling causing performance degradationl

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-25  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-03  2:03 [Bug c/108271] New: " juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
2023-01-03  2:08 ` [Bug target/108271] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-03  2:09 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
2023-08-25  7:43 ` rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-12-21  8:25 ` juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-108271-4-NUQmLB1gBc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).