From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0BD7C3858D32; Tue,  3 Jan 2023 02:09:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0BD7C3858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1672711746;
	bh=UyLpsd4z11bG7hmHLWUeA+UOPJyaVWugdPMIJ4GbQZk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LuYQcm1KW7cpXE25gBrNjEbOY13CXeO08GkA2k56wBcX6b3jFpXwAB4jU2e3PByKz
	 xoKEc9lP62kI1fMJkPvDKvGBO/l4MQZLYTmRtBNNspg7AQnydh9KBgh6qauqSjrt9I
	 zg6nsI6d9nt8WmCeOmCPBjR09g4kEz31rh9vkkFQ=
From: "juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108271] Missed RVV cost model
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 02:09:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: internal-improvement, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108271-4-pVMhyLKozc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108271-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108271-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108271

--- Comment #2 from JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> More likely there should be a generic scheduling model that handles RVV t=
oo
> instead of a cost issue ...

OK. This issue should be fixed after I support all RVV intrinsics.=