From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8D22F3858D39; Wed,  4 Jan 2023 15:46:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8D22F3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1672847181;
	bh=Q6fzx1eSbyb557ISnq15JEfh6frGG0JRmu+aOdVxQKI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=M+Ka2gKyD9uXXt7HJtpUgkGSIyggOqZuwHsaFStxcFg5nbBtTX5/I1zg8qViXPNYm
	 4FyR9NiEBaIhor989F0J0833IxokBYGf7b/F5XfhaT9iiWLBxx4opooIkNX1lkV5NY
	 YfFI6mHW4AYF247GbFydL382FBB5jnjKSsoPFs88=
From: "seurer at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/108280] [10 regression] Many lto excess errors after
 r10-11132-gf543f71c54be74
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 15:46:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.4.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108280-4-h2EHaLRO2V@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108280-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108280-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108280

--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks like the same thing happened to gcc 11.  Should I open another PR =
for
that?=