From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AC88E3858D39; Wed,  4 Jan 2023 13:47:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AC88E3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1672840064;
	bh=RIP/M63GF/TSV37NzWWDp2wfmR46ZrscA4g5fy9E/2E=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wDd1nmKs+iioze9CD+RWplJsnyfGQoycTcXfH2FI3kqNHmxi7DPUIw2tz8mp7g8HM
	 oLpc5PXz3syYAGNhZRx4AS1i870jGGBmLTxCNK023ll0L0A88/lVuYK40qiGGX+O7l
	 KslNEuSXI2k/1e4Ztzbo38IuIDPz64ZsWKUzbols=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108283] Problem when accessing address zero
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 13:47:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-108283-4-kgoK4NwajY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108283

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> As a user I=E2=80=99m not aware of every switch and option of the compile=
r.

So you are saying you don't understand the programming language you are wri=
ting
in.

Again deferencing a null pointer is undefined by the C standard.
Gcc just had an option that makes it well defined.

Also again building for arm-eabi by default is just building for a semi hos=
ted
env. If you want something different you need to use an option.=