From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 43AEF3858C54; Thu,  5 Jan 2023 14:52:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 43AEF3858C54
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1672930363;
	bh=ez4eUMHMzsaaq7R52/kLsgiD4xei0Ck113TP09hTg3o=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=v2NoiQpH7wRC3nUwmWYRGU7C6TuZNd8bijTIwEcjvKXy8NvtZfcZX5fPNcTKQ8qAU
	 +9zmKYAgjLrWqbBo353xRTPP3nncL4Iaybb3FQBuYC2tQgjRY+1v6FGla3UKt1gusc
	 xV8xNmmUkqLoYt6QwiTlVbsB61WE9slDkqejzd6w=
From: "agriff at tin dot it" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/108299] toplevel thread_local variables are not initialized
 if not referenced and initialized at wrong moment when referenced
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2023 14:52:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: agriff at tin dot it
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108299-4-4Jk7LZRQfR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108299-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108299-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108299

--- Comment #5 from Andrea Griffini <agriff at tin dot it> ---
So you are saying that the standard forgot to add "that requires dynamic
initialization" and that this is the intention?=