public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/108333] New: [10.3/10.4/11/12/13/trunk Regression] The behavior of direct-non-list-initialized is not correct, parsing error on valid code
@ 2023-01-08  5:47 yronglin777 at gmail dot com
  2023-01-08  5:50 ` [Bug c++/108333] [10/11/12/13/trunk " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-01-08  6:45 ` [Bug c++/108333] [10/11/12/13/trunk Regression] no_unique_address and direct-non-list-initialization is rejected pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: yronglin777 at gmail dot com @ 2023-01-08  5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108333

            Bug ID: 108333
           Summary: [10.3/10.4/11/12/13/trunk Regression] The behavior of
                    direct-non-list-initialized is not correct, parsing
                    error on valid code
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: yronglin777 at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

GCC parsing error on valid code:

Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/K6edrdTG5 (Thanks Nikolas Klauser)

```
struct NonCopyable {
  NonCopyable(int) {}
  NonCopyable(const NonCopyable&) = delete;
};

struct S {
  S(int i) : val(NonCopyable{1}) {}

  [[no_unique_address]] NonCopyable val;
};

struct T {
  T(int i) : val(NonCopyable{1}) {}

  NonCopyable val;
};

```

This code accept by GCC[9/10.1/10.2], clang and MSVC, but compile failed with
GCC[10.3/10.4/11/12/13/trunk], seems a regression.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/108333] [10/11/12/13/trunk Regression] The behavior of direct-non-list-initialized is not correct, parsing error on valid code
  2023-01-08  5:47 [Bug c++/108333] New: [10.3/10.4/11/12/13/trunk Regression] The behavior of direct-non-list-initialized is not correct, parsing error on valid code yronglin777 at gmail dot com
@ 2023-01-08  5:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2023-01-08  6:45 ` [Bug c++/108333] [10/11/12/13/trunk Regression] no_unique_address and direct-non-list-initialization is rejected pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-08  5:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108333

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |10.5
            Summary|[10.3/10.4/11/12/13/trunk   |[10/11/12/13/trunk
                   |Regression] The behavior of |Regression] The behavior of
                   |direct-non-list-initialized |direct-non-list-initialized
                   |is not correct, parsing     |is not correct, parsing
                   |error on valid code         |error on valid code

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/108333] [10/11/12/13/trunk Regression] no_unique_address and direct-non-list-initialization is rejected
  2023-01-08  5:47 [Bug c++/108333] New: [10.3/10.4/11/12/13/trunk Regression] The behavior of direct-non-list-initialized is not correct, parsing error on valid code yronglin777 at gmail dot com
  2023-01-08  5:50 ` [Bug c++/108333] [10/11/12/13/trunk " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-01-08  6:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-08  6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108333

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup of bug 98995.  See bug 98995 comment #2 on why this is even a language/ABI
issue and it is currently suspended as it might not be a legal thing to do ...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 98995 ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-08  6:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-08  5:47 [Bug c++/108333] New: [10.3/10.4/11/12/13/trunk Regression] The behavior of direct-non-list-initialized is not correct, parsing error on valid code yronglin777 at gmail dot com
2023-01-08  5:50 ` [Bug c++/108333] [10/11/12/13/trunk " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-08  6:45 ` [Bug c++/108333] [10/11/12/13/trunk Regression] no_unique_address and direct-non-list-initialization is rejected pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).