From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2E3243858CDB; Mon,  9 Jan 2023 21:23:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2E3243858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673299432;
	bh=ifve9zHwHaxosZjhUSixJGf1GQS9m6Y0CQ35szBUQnE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=cKx2xTyiPle/W2x1/uyKymUYb+5nMSc6L89RCByCCzlqDQKJFGKIOf2azK7nYzfYz
	 RHdaSxwtjLyHuKCyGKWmIFGgPc5NDkx5Q9PtFfxXmlYAEmUSO1CoYgdwLwEu3YRoy3
	 eJBpeEz0szuo9awO9OEnqrRKUtWahjBZGSAa+LZY=
From: "ruilvo at ua dot pt" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/108342] std::complex: ignoring packed attribute because of
 unpacked non-POD field
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 21:23:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ruilvo at ua dot pt
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108342-4-ACeySlFxYU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108342-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108342-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108342

--- Comment #10 from Rui Oliveira <ruilvo at ua dot pt> ---
So my options are to create like a placeholder, say=20

```c
typedef struct __attribute__((__packed__)) // Packed isn't really necessary
here I think?
{
    float re, im;
} ph_fcomplex_t

```

To silence the warning and get packing to work, and trust
[complex.numbers.general] for a reinterpret_cast into std::complex<float> I
guess.=