From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C74613858D20; Mon,  9 Jan 2023 16:39:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C74613858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673282395;
	bh=FFDCS73DPRD3fDsIt5PSwuv5BC9qfQ/yKGGip5oAS/0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=A137n/x9+1Ywd4XNso9Ra/kCxrXO73+fiXkYDGP3xvdxLYaRlHONo/cNj/1SPkgP7
	 gnXs6O1XAYa6B2uvY/G+YgpHnltQhgrNW7FtzLE+ARuLtp6GcKPUQApykdI8Rzs/fy
	 98ZXvtpY8KmPcEbqei3FPslczO+hC7EvM6xBDALg=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/108342] std::complex: ignoring packed attribute because of
 unpacked non-POD field
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 16:39:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-108342-4-I0nf6MZA5x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108342-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108342-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108342

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2003-July/110087.html

This was done on purpose. GCC also rejects References too while clang accep=
ts
that (but I am not sure it gives the correct code for references of packed
either which is why GCC started to reject it).=