From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7E6B63858D32; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 15:47:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7E6B63858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700840841;
	bh=8vmg3UDXXqBlhnR+21gv3t5RWfQnWEeXEos98nRPX9c=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ff+GniSmg6qNVcf39GVwhO1eksa3i8jNRoiLCV0A6yEddBOcyuidg7dLf8k6eLhFG
	 BFTjTzUgtPKYpd+WMQ42ls2zdM8H9joMURJRpTCWsU7458MGdO2T5wI81i+e6K8Co2
	 K5CzoDv2kvIGMO1bIHCLnTMpomYM0h89Dvcqyco8=
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108351] [13/14 Regression] Dead Code
 Elimination Regression at -O3 since r13-4240-gfeeb0d68f1c708
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 15:47:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-108351-4-VhPamo8edF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108351-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108351-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108351

Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Yann Girsberger from comment #9)
> > Is this reduced from a real-world problem?
>=20
> No, it is reduced from a modified csmith/random program.

In that case let me close this, please reopen if you disagree with my asses=
ment
in comment #5.  Thanks.=