From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4C4673858431; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 12:43:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4C4673858431
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1700829793;
	bh=l5q5/1IALLkAJVDFFY33EeFZT71hDLFJO/OF5l3xqqY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=i3J/RoByJHPqwK78wzpUxx1an1WLj7GgubYhyZA6xNm3rh52FwP4S6SNXc+/c0nFg
	 T39hHGx/Qs/5MpL1LU3dyiDqfeNfMHsYkQPcnR+Kz2yBS+a6jB9evf8ps2DH/eSZZc
	 4DJlsC1QzF5sBAJ2mEf4OQjRkJ7Ni9MOrgsFa1mg=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108351] [13/14 Regression] Dead Code
 Elimination Regression at -O3 since r13-4240-gfeeb0d68f1c708
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 12:43:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-108351-4-rJmr2HIHKS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108351-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108351-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108351

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sjames at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #5)
> If you rename main to something else, like bar, and so the calls to f
> outside of the loop are not considered cold, you get the GCC 12
> behavior.  Is this reduced from a real-world problem?
>=20

Yann?=