From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2B8913858281; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:48:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2B8913858281
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673390926;
	bh=B2ySmW4fCKYHDs/HLJno5lDPFOD1sY+65Ihgtcu8gRs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=jbg/onoEjUGer3hRs5+fO0VMBGskpwXYRxqs5SvsHJCCiv77zkcDqPbeF797dKrYl
	 vu/9IEK9+a4rcbMfuXw5JAc60JxdT5fejTI91xCZfMqZocWgKLk/yGsopnEImivPOG
	 /tFrT08MwMyy/QenKe9nfRv9sX5Geg3Hhv7Nxf8A=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108351] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination
 Regression at -O3 since r13-4240-gfeeb0d68f1c708
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:48:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108351-4-s73HpI9Xpx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108351-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108351-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108351

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I noticed that with the C++ front-end early inline inlines f into main but =
with
the C front-end it does not ...=