From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 67DC63858D26; Wed, 22 May 2024 08:32:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 67DC63858D26
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1716366773;
	bh=VFECQQWSB2/zZmqh0/7yhZc7AMyvx4pAzQO2bHyo+ZE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YEFIaHhkDFePvxgn95JdwNz4aCOmQitYtpBSmxatuZFvmz9hEc8L2Ts99fPgzTEay
	 6TYiW9wn7h5XsASUO0ifz61LpuKbrn4twjm4Xkk2HnXsNpLesSDTCDcm0nYDCAXplU
	 YJlleNI0TwquZhaO1QmXRy8ppXwcj2d7EQWwbaa0=
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108357] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination
 Regression at -O2 since r13-4607-g2dc5d6b1e7ec88
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 08:32:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-108357-4-LOz3gjE232@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108357-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108357-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108357

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED

--- Comment #22 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As reported, the test still FAILs on Solaris/SPARC (and always had).  Also
happens on Linux/sparc64, btw., so nothing Solaris-specific in here.=