public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108360] [13/14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os since r13-2048-g418b71c0d535bf Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 01:25:35 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-108360-4-t1dZ0e81Ap@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-108360-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108360 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I have a patch which gets us to: ``` short int b.2_1; ... b.2_1 = b; _2 = b.2_1 <= 0; _4 = (char) _2; f = _4; f.5_5 = (unsigned char) _2; _6 = f.5_5 << 4; e = _6; _19 = b.2_1 <= 0; _7 = (short int) _19; _21 = _7 << 4; if (b.2_1 == _21) ``` Which is closer. ``` int f(short b) { auto _19 = b <= 0; auto _7 = (short int) _19; auto _21 = _7 << 4; return b == _21; } ``` is just `return false;` as _21's range is `[0,4]` but it is only 0 when `b > 0` And then maybe: (simplify (eq:c @0 (rshift (convert (le @0 integer_zero_p)) INTEGER_CST@1)) (if (wi::to_wide(@1) < element_precision (TREE_TYPE (@0)) - 1) ( { false_value; } )) Is this worth this pattern, I don't know ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-09 1:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-01-10 13:10 [Bug tree-optimization/108360] New: Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os (trunk vs. 12.2.0) yann at ywg dot ch 2023-01-10 14:48 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108360] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -Os since r13-2048-g418b71c0d535bf marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-10 17:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-10 17:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-10 17:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-10 19:18 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2023-01-10 19:26 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2023-01-10 19:28 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2023-03-27 11:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-08 14:37 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-26 6:57 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108360] [13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-27 9:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-07 8:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-09 1:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-05-21 9:13 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108360] [13/14/15 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-108360-4-t1dZ0e81Ap@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).