From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id ABB613858CDA; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:55:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ABB613858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673391323;
	bh=/gzpGXChjESpJXb5QuxvuhDzcpOdnr6Dd39mrEtSeLU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QNcWIGhmAdsdRs9ztgE8WdvGUiZp+kohjjCuNHGNh+F8foMWBANP/3w8rJdJyw/Cq
	 1t2lfChn7WXMpJl45s7IY5bkPiMfVsk19sl8P+DbmHePaHuvGxTfnAb0/XbBLdf1FS
	 A+ic+w8Dx1IRKmRAn9NCCnZnttl5YZwTDYTJhT90=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108365] [9/10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong code
 with -O0
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 22:55:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on cf_known_to_fail keywords
 cf_known_to_work bug_status everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-108365-4-yrD1HA9tvx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108365-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108365-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108365

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-01-10
      Known to fail|                            |7.1.0, 8.1.0
           Keywords|                            |diagnostic
      Known to work|                            |6.1.0, 6.4.0
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
A compile time testcase:

constexpr char b[23] =3D {1};
long t =3D long((unsigned long)(-2147483647 - 1))
    / long(b[0] ? -1 : 0);

This should not warn with -std=3Dc++11 .

Confirmed.=