From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 68C283858D33; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:35:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 68C283858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1673886932; bh=StTY6mtpt5RZjIHcnNqtCqNPkVHsmAC4solhe57sK4g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AsRgZ10XPIo9ENV4UHA43QYRaNY838EO0oYf/vLGhBSiF+XQXkah/DzvvaIKKXhbs 2/mwmOLvUKs6bNDYdWeltpIwaoQmWHYM4blJ5vS1VqtTDp2ivFritqbCe8utt+FnIl CJc64K+QfwWExT5hZd4Vjyk+lEkp4N2HJqM9FeDo= From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/108396] [12/13 Regression] PPCLE: vec_vsubcuq missing since r12-5752-gd08236359eb229 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:35:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108396 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2) > Yes, it's a typo, which makes the macro definition change to: >=20 > #define vec_vsubcuqP __builtin_vec_vsubcuq Yup. > Unfortunately we don't have the testing coverage in testsuite for the > expected name vec_vsubcuq (in rs6000-vecdefines.h): Is it hard to add one for all (or many) of the legacy builtins? Do we want to test more than just if it compiles?=