From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 63D983857438; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:00:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 63D983857438 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1673636441; bh=MBaez/9orH2tAOYxD4YZwYsfnlv8gVv1KdPnWBT7tJM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pFfbltNCOE9iHkN3NbiLxMaQ72zbnD6UtEbnCGd2VgsSaohDHOxIYuNOxaC/06+PQ wJslXdacRZHAX1v6gLpMg0D0qwZYOdOaEzMe9Cde7NkMhVwKTRRqVpit6BQvFHapPK tH3MohFvtMmQpnpGlzaU1lpTDMjZbNrQ960ZN+h4= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/108396] [12/13 Regression] PPCLE: vec_vsubcuq missing Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:00:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords short_desc cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108396 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |rejects-valid Summary|PPCLE: vec_vsubcuq missing |[12/13 Regression] PPCLE: | |vec_vsubcuq missing Last reconfirmed| |2023-01-13 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Target Milestone|--- |12.3 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This looks like a regression introduced by r12-3169-ge2693a72701fe5 . rs6000-overload.def:[VEC_VSUBCUQ, vec_vsubcuqP, __builtin_vec_vsubcuq] There looks like a typo of including a P in the overload name for some reas= on ...=