From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7062B3858D37; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 22:11:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7062B3858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677017486;
	bh=thOKO0Y6z/CXoQewGGnx4HK5NdQThd+FNsLny5HouCQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=oSB0KdwiSkkdFki6MdyIC2r99aZE9PikBf+ZeMYsUbLWkevWXVs121JbevKUsSKjF
	 1Max7vLDahyXScuHzCK63U/0/A1vEKEnaNZn1ZsMbc0YI1msA3rRoaeXD+w8bBosIS
	 Pbg74wZEHPb55/bRcYSWoXDhM6JWZuRjel7CR6hY=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108419] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination
 Regression at -O2 since r13-440-g98e475a8f58
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 22:11:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108419-4-3OwOG7RfQX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108419-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108419-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108419

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hmm, the first difference between the trunk and GCC 12.2.0 is inside IV-OPT=
s.
But I don't see why that would make a difference ...=