From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9C0AA3858D20; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 14:20:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9C0AA3858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1674310850;
	bh=PdBgIdSsGu5EtDVKSgO4tcTZIT197gr3LTM4LGmVE+4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Iju5cRS6suI2/i+jGbmXUtTu+Mvi7/pAV1l1NuZQANEpu03+5nV0Jyn5I3ZVoA2WM
	 DbvxUuvmPAABKkoD8IBBGchU37jAKbjSEPvCZmYOCEcqnbaX905cdOS9+ucFyKtVMb
	 QHkt1XTcbJoX3Z8x8yt+AgdGJcJPBg2CL8HKRhHs=
From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108482] [13 Regression] ice in
 expand_LOOP_DIST_ALIAS with -O3 -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 14:20:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108482-4-3JCnRPxqQu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108482-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108482-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108482

--- Comment #6 from David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail dot com> ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> > The bug seems to exist since sometime before g:02c031088ac0bbf7, dated =
20221220.
>=20
> I tried out a revision from a month earlier, dated 2022-11-20,
> g:59cc4da605e5cb8e, and the bug seems to exist there too.
>=20
> I will try g:89999f2358724fa4

That worked, so the current range is [g:89999f2358724fa4,g:59cc4da605e5cb8e=
].

I will try a git bisect.=