From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 05E3D3858D28; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:32:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 05E3D3858D28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1674635527; bh=Nz7pC3/AM9bxLDRsPy05nl6NXjmBwZAfFsDUTXytYRg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lfr86vDpuix1ftD3h19VYyGUVAuQ9jHSUwTucK3oAzU9ypxjR0AZW8M52l3cXay0Y 3FLPDAOkNKqFiSDhjEGKYpVUAGnQTsV6SrY3PaMeKTn9YXTXxYRf/ai4+f74ksvgqs AMIv+2R+ckOCJ/WGQDNJt7gCkOI1rbIFX55DeAcQ= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/108495] [10/11/12/13 Regression] aarch64 ICE with __builtin_aarch64_rndr Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:32:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108495 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Why? You shouldn't use the builtins directly, they are implementation deta= il for implementing the intrinsics and the intrinsics don't suffer ever from t= his problem because they ensure the correct target options already.=