From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 94D713858D33; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:21:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 94D713858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1674645690;
	bh=YnyN1zMcw0Ws/gvgJdOqfKOtEBCNUQVN6sAgBqUmpss=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=cFOfLVY5sk6aE7DJM5/V5xJrjscXp2Bm9QDGdmQ76CNhJotGlHR9srz6ReuAxHT+R
	 FeoLEEnZI5JDFPhjKQ2vSxsgPW+zGbi0/r2lWd6/BHGH3NQ8L1PtzKbYe9glN0YC79
	 9XDLhd8ItOZWGFECuF8HDF2ku96fyoFh+8m0R3c4=
From: "hr.jonas.hansen at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/108536] Difference when using requires and enable_if with
 class constructor
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:21:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hr.jonas.hansen at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108536-4-VNC0ETi1xI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108536-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108536

--- Comment #2 from hr.jonas.hansen at gmail dot com ---
I can see that, and that would work. But it really seems like a work-around=
? Is
there a reason for the difference in behavior?=