From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 23B683858D28; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 12:36:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 23B683858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1674736586;
	bh=I+U1u5PmlxQ4w2tKPeiSABtNudkwb745seW0K4sdoyw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=vBoXeqXsr9U4R3KwEirBWMU9UWGLJXyso7fLEYU531/DjjayCQuEppy36mj4AesLK
	 S58uJEyO6pbpB9uTPk/jHFA61pxvLpGJLKV+4ILyJuO8I3/cVdhRLzushRMgcs1i95
	 sALwykpsxEb213vrh/4k+x/qaBOB9WuiE43ke0aI=
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/108558] OpenMP/Fortran 'has_device_addr' clause getting
 lost?
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 12:36:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-108558-4-dcu3GUwIKe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108558-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108558-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108558

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-01-26
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I bet that this is a problem of 'gfc_split_omp_clauses':

--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.cc
@@ -6352,4 +6352,6 @@ gfc_split_omp_clauses (gfc_code *code,
          clausesa[GFC_OMP_SPLIT_TARGET].lists[OMP_LIST_IS_DEVICE_PTR]
            =3D code->ext.omp_clauses->lists[OMP_LIST_IS_DEVICE_PTR];
+         clausesa[GFC_OMP_SPLIT_TARGET].lists[OMP_LIST_HAS_DEVICE_ADDR]
+           =3D code->ext.omp_clauses->lists[OMP_LIST_HAS_DEVICE_ADDR];
          clausesa[GFC_OMP_SPLIT_TARGET].device
            =3D code->ext.omp_clauses->device;=