From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6EB8E3858C60; Thu,  9 Feb 2023 07:41:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6EB8E3858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675928506;
	bh=fzIO3E35zMoxor6l5Unovw/dIgVekJPQTkynujcjvMM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=NQ+Ubg0Tmi6MGQxkgejT5um0cvVvp+H8CnPsPy/yh0Lu0y9lIoc+4NtcDP9BqLdcq
	 CFzXJULEGT8OADGBhs8p3HWW0pBop6JqS6v6OFr693K2iSQC5LPD2icsMAzfJpg1C5
	 kL2Ssvo4u6J5IDV+JoDTyS9HGrZi3JmUD9Jpxx4c=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108583] [13 Regression] wrong code with vector division
 by uint16 at -O2
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 07:41:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108583-4-FocXwnZdWb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108583-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108583-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108583

--- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108583
>=20
> --- Comment #24 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > Sure that works I think, I'll do that then.
>=20
> Just to check, I'm regtesting the patch, I assume you want me to revert t=
he
> hook as well right? Since nothing will be using it.

Sure=