From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5F4023858D35; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 15:47:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5F4023858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675007227;
	bh=0bBjx57oXSa4CP3fmMrgCmeNkIPwjA+Uh6XNAyMzWi4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
	b=Pk/EyWSp8Bc5QuK5WZWwtpqJtOl+XjANUm87rNbSg5ZGRwdnUxHmi8YAQG1yRbXgK
	 sLSCbkdIXvyYu7GvXKkJTvLtxD7vVFN5BwPCiuY5xuC44wxkbJ6jwJpV5ljkIZSWYO
	 qBl+VCvnT7pfLJVVjCdWyrWyCan/o8hRpbdinw80=
From: "Mark_B53 at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/108591] New: void{} does not error out in 12.1
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 15:47:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Mark_B53 at yahoo dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-108591-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108591

            Bug ID: 108591
           Summary: void{} does not error out in 12.1
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: Mark_B53 at yahoo dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

void fn1() {
    return void{};  // fails in gcc 11.3, passes in gcc 12.1
}
void fn2() {
    return void();  // passes in both gcc 11.3 and gcc 12.1
}

I would not have expected fn1 to be legal C++.=