From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9ED003858C74; Thu,  9 Feb 2023 11:54:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9ED003858C74
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675943693;
	bh=i2D6nDi8VxyEA8dOI+smpe88w5aUUdSd2LEx/Jgv4Rk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=lwXhqq1xCfGMr/UV12w4gXylJ4LKjuIocrDZhoY8WS0SyA8TQ6qIEbz0aoRjr7nuh
	 jR0VSAr28zEHk1WH0xx2utfoZbB8hpMitsI/lIWH4VsRMEYMM2TFYiBA0WbP26Yib5
	 202oKrW++elkUlBFHs5QuF6RH7mAWhxeZfYUbkrQ=
From: "balder at yahooinc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108599] [12 Regression] Incorrect code generation newer
 intel architectures
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 11:54:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: balder at yahooinc dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108599-4-W31Y2Q9b8u@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108599-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108599-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108599

--- Comment #10 from Henning Baldersheim <balder at yahooinc dot com> ---
Will this be backported to gcc-12, or do we need to wait for gcc-13 ?=