From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 64B043858C74; Thu,  9 Feb 2023 12:02:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 64B043858C74
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675944120;
	bh=sneRffyQ70q0pYuJ/B2OdmC0a9TyONAcNlA3eHx9yw8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=IU5DZB63sWgbL6TBJz0g07oveCe6ZWBPj3LMmuEOWLPbx3b7toFz3TX4pVLy0Bxxs
	 aUCuUh30VllmtU96EmZryz9iVLW/YWF+ILNrorbuAYZI4mnbEm9SeU6UjQNmwgCv1j
	 83JOl7dpKv4NjSCF8sjCfNfK0hnNzaJMFosQDb+M=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108599] [12 Regression] Incorrect code generation newer
 intel architectures
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 12:02:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108599-4-XV15t3ba4z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108599-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108599-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108599

--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
At some point yes, don't know when exactly.  Will need to collect several
dozens of backports and test them.=