From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 048493858CDA; Wed,  1 Feb 2023 09:07:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 048493858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675242428;
	bh=LvNx5wW6u1Ci+O3kQyDjI4I7vV2ZUVghLm8bBa+AUOY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=WkmzWQcVw6YvhbdDBc5ESBRsGB5x7BVeujsbqogz6hxgHqPMqiqQJCpHjt2yl18WN
	 Lzi4eg5IMQQ1N+qVqkhesTaAoyRx9aip54UAPe9EkISHBGyKIEIyv3F6nAsSJR0sE3
	 dGy7zoEjNQbq41hkubJNRZKlPVVyi5d8iKOHgrII=
From: "crazylht at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108601] [13 Regression] vector peeling ICEs
 with VLA in gcc_r in SPEC2017 since
 g:c13223b790bbc5e4a3f5605e057eac59b61b2c85
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 09:07:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: crazylht at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108601-4-QhWg9WEmAw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108601-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108601

--- Comment #14 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---

> I think we should remove the vect_can_peel_nonlinear_iv_p call from
> vectorizable_nonlinear_induction and adjust vect_can_peel_nonlinear_iv_p
> to require a .is_constant () VF.

Yes, testing a patch.=