From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id F25413858412; Thu,  2 Feb 2023 08:22:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F25413858412
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675326134;
	bh=Mwl4P+WGIhkveYY+jiXGEkIlxAtj1ffraKE4PQ9QxlM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=lz0wI8bvbWN3I2nccdj90PVYvjaXMijuAD/pjReYAVeRPuJUHA2ZPfz9FSgjJHqg6
	 IuoP3X7jyfgxXC+DOVC5ImkyyIIRrMN6SSXJkMJIAW5C6GfqHbWYECK6xM/pVFaoro
	 qoqpTwWGFRJ08gXesiGkhRkO74v2uh2uHiXMRJh8=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/108623] We need to grow the precision field in
 tree_type_common for PowerPC
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 08:22:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108623-4-iAnp6mE76m@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108623-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108623-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108623

--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023, meissner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108623
>=20
> Michael Meissner <meissner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>=20
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
>    Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-02-01
>      Ever confirmed|0                           |1
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
>=20
> --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner <meissner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Yes I agree we want an assetion in sext_hwi as well.
>=20
> Richard, are you going to submit the patch, or did you want me to do it (=
along
> with the assertion)?

Please you do it, as far as I understand Richard S. no further adjustment
is necessary but we could simplify some code after the change(?)=