From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BBE7B3858C83; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:11:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BBE7B3858C83
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677589917;
	bh=u2j/8BVIAaMebP+aCCJVrxXEwNqpVqt9T58OIrFjBq0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=sFi/wMOEI8AmvOAPtx0ZM2kemzJy+nBpibUMiolXsmeo/1Wh9UP2FmGZYAQ7uN+QT
	 fWPd/DKomVMlaehzw/9mCvuE/bWBN9NDnshAEnGU0Hy89b0dZKvvKSigt1i0iHR70i
	 sBRY/sRvVa5jOf1C64GvzL7i3jsAXz/MOChmfOns=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108630] build failure with LTO enabled
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:11:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, lto
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also
Message-ID: <bug-108630-4-tX5bH0xOty@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108630-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108630-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108630

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92192

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> I suggest simply not using LTO for libstdc++.

LTO will almost certainly break src/c++98/globals_io.cc so I don'tthink we =
can
support building libstdc++ with LTO for now.=