public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/108637] ASAN at -O2 misses a stack-use-after-scope
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 22:06:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-108637-4-a73RIqIukY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-108637-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108637
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #3 from Li Shaohua <shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch> ---
(In reply to Li Shaohua from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > PRE removes the load/stores from/to *f .
> > Basically the compiler is able to remove the use-after-scope usage with -O2
> > and above.
>
> Well, this makes sense to me while in this case only -O2 not other opt
> levels did not report this use-after-scope usage.
I looked into this again and found that for GCC-12, it was indeed the case. But
for the trunk, I indeed observed that PRE did not optimize away load/store.
Compiler explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/sb658P1cM
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-02 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-02 12:10 [Bug sanitizer/108637] New: " shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch
2023-02-02 19:33 ` [Bug sanitizer/108637] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-02 21:51 ` shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch
2023-02-02 22:06 ` shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch [this message]
2023-02-03 13:32 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-108637-4-a73RIqIukY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).