public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "weilongzhang0538 at foxmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/108641] Hooking MS-MPI system into the NONMEM installation failed
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:16:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-108641-4-u6N2q7N5bT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-108641-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108641

--- Comment #2 from weilomg <weilongzhang0538 at foxmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> >Fatal Error: Wrong module version '6' (expected '5') for file 'sizes.mod' opened at (1)
> 
> 
> This means the modules you are using was compiled with a newer version of
> Gfortran.
> I think you should ask where you got the module from what exact version of
> GCC/gfortran is for their library.

THANKS！
according the message from MPI———" MODULE MPI_SIZEOFS
!      This module contains the definitions for MPI_SIZEOF for the
!      predefined, named types in Fortran 90.  This is provided
!      as a separate module to allow MPI_SIZEOF to supply the
!      basic size information even when we do not provide the
!      arbitrary choice types
       IMPLICIT NONE"  。

AND my MY Fortran is 95 。maybe is reason，it is just my guess。
Thank you for your advice, but is there a difference between the 95 and 90
versions of fortran? I would like to check again

(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> >Fatal Error: Wrong module version '6' (expected '5') for file 'sizes.mod' opened at (1)
> 
> 
> This means the modules you are using was compiled with a newer version of
> Gfortran.
> I think you should ask where you got the module from what exact version of
> GCC/gfortran is for their library.

THANKS！
according the message from MPI———" MODULE MPI_SIZEOFS
!      This module contains the definitions for MPI_SIZEOF for the
!      predefined, named types in Fortran 90.  This is provided
!      as a separate module to allow MPI_SIZEOF to supply the
!      basic size information even when we do not provide the
!      arbitrary choice types
       IMPLICIT NONE"  。

AND my MY Fortran is 95 。maybe is reason，it is just my guess。
Thank you for your advice, but is there a difference between the 95 and 90
versions of fortran? I would like to check again

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-03  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-02 15:27 [Bug debug/108641] New: " weilongzhang0538 at foxmail dot com
2023-02-02 17:54 ` [Bug fortran/108641] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-03  2:16 ` weilongzhang0538 at foxmail dot com [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-108641-4-u6N2q7N5bT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).