From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3851F3858C60; Sat,  4 Feb 2023 04:28:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3851F3858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675484932;
	bh=5UJT1bLv02sTy+L/8TnbFf0yHpWHjoM/u04Q866Ck1E=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=SzveHDz7WWrOdd740wKnT1vKM7qe0bpQlqiCUIC0dfOcbdESRvkJ/xPK6y6qfCiUh
	 wwYZ0Zk7HirwPET/b673qwwmgBy9ekGeRCrwD8wP7hePmNlRAO8cCAw1y6Y+bpuBy1
	 4BpqfIjSD2F5qqzBcWPsu8fqkyMiVJ7stFE7UEFM=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108647] [13 Regression] ICE in upper_bound,
 at value-range.h:950 with -O3 since r13-2974-g67166c9ec35d58ef
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 04:28:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108647-4-MZaHEqFO1z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108647-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108647-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108647

--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
How could these changes result in
../harfbuzz-6.0.0/src/hb-map.hh:295:5: error: no match for =E2=80=98operato=
r|=E2=80=99 (operand
types are =E2=80=98hb_filter_iter_t<hb_array_t<hb_hashmap_t<unsigned int, u=
nsigned int,
true>::item_t>, bool (hb_hashmap_t<unsigned int, unsigned int,
true>::item_t::*)() const, const<unnamed struct>&, 0>=E2=80=99 and
=E2=80=98hb_reduce_t<hb_hashmap_t<unsigned int, unsigned int, true>::hash()
const::<lambda(uint32_t, const hb_hashmap_t<unsigned int, unsigned int,
true>::item_t&)>, unsigned int>=E2=80=99)
errors?  I can see that with a cross-compiler, so VRP miscompiling the C++ =
FE
is not an option.=