From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7892C3858C52; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 16:33:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7892C3858C52 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1675441994; bh=hQso5uxT+p8S4rI+LzFMQF8xgfZMVh6aK79YIi34O1k=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RoLcvWEReqJu3M4AnmIXbYALpzBODk+FeFNw1R6rzRaZ0LUqmQxcU1bLu4wSwJZM7 xuNYfJBer/yVpDGRMxxy+8wijMHD6UPv6Xx9k3Yn2p+XlfJ+L8P5pDWlnfLEb00vB/ gEIPTCRV7yzT90LLK+iPNF6IpQYVz4gDXI1hhWAg= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108647] [13 Regression] ICE in upper_bound, at value-range.h:950 with -O3 since r13-2974-g67166c9ec35d58ef Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 16:33:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108647 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gn= u.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 54405 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D54405&action=3Dedit gcc13-pr108647.patch Here is what I'm about to test momentarily, though I must say I don't understand those operator_cast changes at all. I thought casts are unary operators and so I don't understand what kind of range would be op2 in that case.=