From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C909F3858408; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 08:06:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C909F3858408 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1675670795; bh=xvr4lDObrcsp72vymMMu3wcHLKXCEpX3m307b9u7JeY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SEAITa95IxGMIxo9Fi8/esCFC0ljwYBIpFzdNe73KnQukJ+9YlkGHyIQ5BBvnKMif QtY4v/PEqplj3SE4RYqZo34thNGdjZJcxMKP67unE+fwyDUQ2Jss6P1VUUgCHEf8yS BIJKNCwiqVTjzpLKkEZt2D7A5gsU+kMA13iXZ6XY= From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108655] [13 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2134 since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649 Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 08:06:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108655 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5df573f76bb9b42231e722145033c548a5fcdf9a commit r13-5708-g5df573f76bb9b42231e722145033c548a5fcdf9a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Mon Feb 6 09:05:56 2023 +0100 ubsan: Fix up another spot that should have been BUILT_IN_UNREACHABLE_T= RAPS [PR108655] We ICE on the following testcase, because ivcanon calls gimple_build_builtin_unreachable but doesn't expect it would need vops. BUILT_IN_UNREACHABLE_TRAP I've introduced yesterday doesn't need vops and should be used in that case instead of BUILT_IN_TRAP which needs them. 2023-02-06 Jakub Jelinek PR tree-optimization/108655 * ubsan.cc (sanitize_unreachable_fn): For -funreachable-traps or -fsanitize=3Dunreachable -fsanitize-trap=3Dunreachable return BUILT_IN_UNREACHABLE_TRAP decl rather than BUILT_IN_TRAP. * gcc.dg/pr108655.c: New test.=