From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3A89F3858CDB; Mon,  6 Feb 2023 09:46:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3A89F3858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675676808;
	bh=iGEProi1GqjQL8U2DDJOV4ZpMPOUecf7qJ/HoMt1xbU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=xnTBWe6uo7qfdY8MupL/Zxd4EFDQFzsdp5fMWhGMaLMRxjcw8uzGEx9k/pc1hBpXE
	 tl2meiftJR3MjbrGgfUgoAhr1aG/Z9kWsuft9su7nCaUZtWskeiJK03yfSg/0vVf8N
	 BYeAXF+i99GGwZQMSJTB8XJkLwbs/IuHYyG6I5r0=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/108656] [12/13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure
 (length) w/ -O2 -fno-ipa-pure-const -fno-tree-dce --param
 early-inlining-insns=0 since r12-5236
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 09:46:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compare-debug-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108656-4-poyh1RccoU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108656-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108656-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108656

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Created attachment 54412 [details]
> gcc13-pr108656.patch
>=20
> So shall we fix it like this then?

But isn't this the wrong "side"?  returns_twice means it is the abnormal
control _receiver_, it doesn't perform an abnormal goto itself.

stmt_starts_bb_p is correct here, so where does it go wrong?=