From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 81C663858C2D; Fri,  3 Feb 2023 21:58:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 81C663858C2D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675461513;
	bh=neO7DTrPi8wYBE/2Pu5+NGf+NHG+y2q/gOw6zVnuev0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KIbhc5qFaRYsxrVwFcrw1a3w8aiCbDw5hzB7Knra6tS51cK6ryKFWTQ4qsZpZlG7x
	 mN/4KGFOP+EHxNJFJoRqXk/xbFCeG493rcWt10cIguMYZ5UBA0udmI5MP1FHxRRrmz
	 jOtN/1Lzf9yTrE8XQw/uMP+mrhBQQlMjzvrpZBbc=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108659] Suboptimal 128 bit atomics codegen on AArch64
 and x64
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 21:58:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108659-4-ICow5cuKcU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108659-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108659-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108659

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #8)
> Yes that sounds like a reasonable approach.

I don't think so.  Not all variables on which __atomic_* intrinsics are used
are actually _Atomic, the vars can be embedded in const aggregates etc.=