From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 880C43858C52; Sat,  4 Feb 2023 00:33:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 880C43858C52
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675470810;
	bh=lEM216v0R5wHSRIL6LFH8b5E9+1PvSS7s2nsOlM8NCQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=HPf7GTSlmgQY309J2Zo+G0urRl957ArSe+Pf9Ng3yr1bOJ3D9+thQwadCfltKVMAd
	 5+134wkFHifaJhFt8wobnQi5JDWpKzWQ31e40d6pOyihpMW473JxPX2OA6xgp234/+
	 tAUY4m0ExpJM9DogHQ9RlbccT4wleQuf8mUftngY=
From: "alvaro.begue at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108667] Spurious "may be used uninitialized
 [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]" warning
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 00:33:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: alvaro.begue at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108667-4-qFk3F3zAOb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108667-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108667-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108667

--- Comment #2 from Alvaro Begue <alvaro.begue at gmail dot com> ---
Yes, this is a reduction of real code. I'm writing a signal class and I wro=
te a
small test for it. It worked fine when compiling unoptimized, but the optim=
ized
version gave me this odd warning.

Would it be interesting to see the original code? It's only around 50 lines=
 of
code.=