From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 277FB3857C44; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 20:03:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 277FB3857C44 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1675800232; bh=q0kWw0zOZPzlZDBoY5ozvDw0hThKTin6KIE4ruiLylk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=k6bu/Nkh6s0Xnr0PYNKJh3gbIItwpmQfDGTqn0NZnMzSMgCnPplb1IMUe4hgNgfow aaS1tVR96fTOykX+DkQOnI8KPwUVrUShSc1h6TzVjRwS+GWHO8u9z2YAkT9V9KUEZt amd+qsKuBLErS33K0q12uBs6mF/v7rVu1D5nmLf0= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108684] [12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 20:03:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, inline-asm, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108684 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > I think that is how inline asm always behaved. If it is not ok to be DCEd > when the result is dead, one needs to use volatile keyword. Oh you are right I always forgot that (yes I double checked the manual this time around), anyways I am going to test (the other) Andrew's patch and will submit it.=