From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4E6B63858D33; Tue,  7 Feb 2023 19:38:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E6B63858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675798705;
	bh=xWvyBCRNqfxoxUPJBEEufpNCh8HhUXdHWAc/uGUfxm8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=lYWLB9OWf+CgzbJprNXEk4udJs07ELPdlL2SzG4WnZPRPK4SDXbRqQ/H7EwLejROC
	 mTMVGP7K9aqf5i5cKG9H17MHveLY0XRx5mqlOOe8eQxzQBhDCzUsA5MiXYGEzvQHRC
	 K80ZtW7QctLLmGBRLOwSvnCqPKOmlTGry3qFVFvs=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjKysvMTA4Njk4XSBbMTMgUmVncmVzc2lvbl0gZGVjbHR5?=
 =?UTF-8?B?cGUgKChUKCkgKyDigJhleGNlc3NfcHJlY2lzaW9uX2V4cHLigJkgbm90IHN1?=
 =?UTF-8?B?cHBvcnRlZCBieSBkdW1wX2V4cHI8ZXhwcmVzc2lvbiBlcnJvcj4pKSBtZWRp?=
 =?UTF-8?B?YW4obmRhcnJheTxUPikgW3dpdGggVCA9IGRvdWJsZV3igJk6IHNpbmNlICBy?=
 =?UTF-8?B?MTMtMzI5MC1nOThlMzQxMTMwZjg3OTg0YQ==?=
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 19:38:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-108698-4-bnv8KU1qDu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108698-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108698-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108698

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 54423
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D54423&action=3Dedit
gcc13-pr108698.patch

Actually, if it is just EXCESS_PRECISION_EXPR around REAL_CST, that one can=
 be
handled easily compatibly with what it used to do before.
I haven't been able to get EXCESS_PRECISION_EXPR with other operands so far=
.=