From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 29C523858D33; Tue,  7 Feb 2023 23:30:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 29C523858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675812638;
	bh=q6godhD7/Ol81Fp84SUpWxPg8CNQvL7Y2cVVfie0C1g=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=oLmDJx0GDGJZWYwb/0P1P9utct7bm4jeBn2ANTswXjX4No6rznocPiEI0NFY6Yb/n
	 KIBrw3hwVovt3sw3t3KtIfUllRYGwjXKkAPaq9yuCMfUFqkE/Nor8pbgrkMozlOgzN
	 MZ25bfdhy0nCJjtYjKleLKSJsrl3+A16+p8KYgnk=
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/108704] [13 Regression] Many
 -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value false positives seen in qemu's
 softfloat.c
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 23:30:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108704-4-wXlRltAo9E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108704-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108704-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108704

--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Adding -fno-analyzer-state-purge fixes the false positive, looks like it's
erroneously pruning the value of fp0 immediately after the first assignment=
.=