From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 87A4B3858C5F; Fri, 10 Feb 2023 15:35:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 87A4B3858C5F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1676043319;
	bh=JsK7AfaSR240a5YDCZ9MuI7TyCVV+Ih7f7jRVoLc/Pc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=FAnoRsWKc8GZjN0zp6vtJNFBL78HZE5LSB1Jfnhj0FaVR72Me3c5qjZCnPTKrV5aR
	 WSSwnZcun/dDGfMX4E1OvBkHyi+Tblu1THtDQdnWpM26bbYKGLei/WmwAHSaz3HijN
	 wlFUM4Bpt9vwmZI3n9ijaEp5gx7Poz/fnyhw/VA8=
From: "rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108705] [13 Regression] Unexpected CPU time
 usage with LTO in ranger propagation
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 15:35:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108705-4-sUmcUYobLR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108705-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108705

--- Comment #9 from Rimvydas (RJ) <rimvydas.jas at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #8)
> This fix I just checked in for 108687 exhibited similar performance
> characteristics, also in the same pass.. Perhaps it will fix your problem.

Thank you!  Will have to check original cases still, but for testcase varia=
nts
even bumping calls count from 16 to 222 now takes only:
 assumed size:   ~6s dominator optimization 4.97 ( 85%)
 assumed shape: ~20s callgraph functions expansion 16.47 ( 79%)
  mainly callgraph ipa passes (22%)+alias stmt walk (11%)+tree ssa inc (14%=
)=