From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 33FBD3858D39; Wed,  8 Feb 2023 08:43:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 33FBD3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675845839;
	bh=vCwCJ1Wbgggp+WkazsxRA9XmYyZTZTNzXg9owBd0JqA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=RUdgMF8tP7z2spKwCQvQGlj+iijMj3El7Ygekd5DB2f99/p9JZZlfdy6BK0lOlwNa
	 lXkNA7F5bxPRZlTkMgr+0pAfl5QLE02+fAV3XxMk6JSaiDZ6jAodlpltDWMk0zG+Rg
	 urgpF4P8wA/KVDar8r4CG5I8MWQgL9yAdzysPvn0=
From: "klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/108712] Missing optimization with memory-barrier
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 08:43:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108712-4-1BuwKdKbxb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108712-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108712-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108712

--- Comment #1 from Wilhelm M <klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com> ---
And using

__asm__ __volatile__ ("" : : : "memory");=20


there is no optimization at all.=